
Frequently asked questions for cybersecurity evaluation for hardware and software.
QIMA proposes a step-by-step approach to its clients during security evaluations, using Flaw Hypothesis Methodology based on our own Common Criteria experience.
The essence of the methodology is to set up the Flaw Hypothesis and then to test the hypothesis by analyzing the documentation in more depth and detail and finally by penetration testing.Based on the errors found, we perform a “generalization” of the errors, eliminate or correct them and perform a re-check. The target security level can be reached on an increasing basis: first solving the most aching problems, then strengthening the security of the IT system gradually.
Security by design
Secure coding training
Vulnerability assessment
Penetration testing
Hardening
Security audit
For mobile applications QIMA proposes to follow the OWASP Mobile Application Security Verification Standard. The evaluation process is based on MASVS-L1 Standard Security level and additionally extended to MASVS-L2 Defense-in-Depth level.
It depends on the product we test, and many factors such as product complexity and assurance claims. Usually a simple penetration task can take a few weeks, a complex vulnerability assessment project can take a few months, whilst a higher evaluation assurance level of Common Criteria evaluation could even take 6-12 months depending on the quality of manufacturer documents and the number of deficiencies found during the evaluation.